<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Really Just Me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/</link>
	<description>Now with 90% less monkey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 04:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geof F. Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-43235</link>
		<dc:creator>Geof F. Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwertyuppy.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/01/is-it-really-just-me/#comment-43235</guid>
		<description>A Mexican who doesn&#039;t like tacos is like a Canadian who doesn&#039;t like hockey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Mexican who doesn&#8217;t like tacos is like a Canadian who doesn&#8217;t like hockey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-43233</link>
		<dc:creator>*daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwertyuppy.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/01/is-it-really-just-me/#comment-43233</guid>
		<description>Is there really a person in the world who doesn&#039;t like tacos? 

*Dan is rooting for that person being a Mexican*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there really a person in the world who doesn&#8217;t like tacos? </p>
<p>*Dan is rooting for that person being a Mexican*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cousin dave</title>
		<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-43227</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwertyuppy.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/01/is-it-really-just-me/#comment-43227</guid>
		<description>I really really like Tacos!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really really like Tacos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-43215</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwertyuppy.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/01/is-it-really-just-me/#comment-43215</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s pretty much what the dictionary said.  You&#039;re right, too, in that I, at least, think of ubiquity as being relatively innocuous.  I hadn&#039;t thought of pervasiveness as being malevolent, but the dictionary agreed with you there, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s pretty much what the dictionary said.  You&#8217;re right, too, in that I, at least, think of ubiquity as being relatively innocuous.  I hadn&#8217;t thought of pervasiveness as being malevolent, but the dictionary agreed with you there, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: *danie</title>
		<link>http://www.qwertyuppy.com/2007/08/is-it-really-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-43210</link>
		<dc:creator>*danie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qwertyuppy.com/index.php/archives/2007/08/01/is-it-really-just-me/#comment-43210</guid>
		<description>I believe the difference is in what the words convey, not so much their direct meaning. Their different aspects, if you will.

Ubiquitous hints at commonness. At something being extremely non-unique.

Pervasiveness hints at something that spreads. It has a tinge of malevolence. Also, when something is pervasive, it hasn&#039;t necessarily *already* spread to all parts; it has the capability and tendency to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the difference is in what the words convey, not so much their direct meaning. Their different aspects, if you will.</p>
<p>Ubiquitous hints at commonness. At something being extremely non-unique.</p>
<p>Pervasiveness hints at something that spreads. It has a tinge of malevolence. Also, when something is pervasive, it hasn&#8217;t necessarily *already* spread to all parts; it has the capability and tendency to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

